systematic craft feedback for astrophotography โ not a judgment, a mirror
astroscore uses Claude AI to analyse astrophotography images against a set of craft parameters โ signal-to-noise, processing, composition, star quality, detail, colour palette, and more โ and returns a structured, systematic score calibrated against AstroBin's IOTD, Top Pick, Top Pick Nomination, and general image population.
The motivation is simple: consistent, dispassionate, parameter-by-parameter feedback is genuinely hard to get. Human critique is valuable but variable (across people, but even with the same person over time!).
This tool won't tell you whether your image moves someone emotionally โ that's not its job (and besides how people respond to an image is deeply personal). It analyses craft, not feeling.
A secondary curiosity: running actual IOTDs and TPs through the tool can be illuminating. The inconsistencies that emerge perhaps reveal something about how those selections are made, or the importance (or not) of such selections!
the universe belongs to all of us, and each person's interaction with it is valid.